HomeSystems › Labouchere

Labouchere: cross numbers off a line on wins, add on losses — tested to destruction

HALF OF ALL PLAYERS BUST⚙ computed
We ran 200,000 sessions of Labouchere ($5 base on red, $500 bankroll, $500 table max, 100 spins, European wheel). Result: 60.9% of sessions busted, the median player finished at $0, and the realized house edge was 2.72% — statistically identical to the wheel’s 2.70%. A cancellation system: it reshapes how you lose, never how much on average.

The distribution — what 200,000 bankrolls did

MetricValueRead it as
Bust rate60.9%sessions that hit $0 within 100 spins
Hit the table max0.2%the cap the system pretends doesn’t exist
Median finish$0the typical session — wiped out
10th / 90th percentile$0 / $1200the bad night vs the good night
Mean finish$402the average — always below $500, by exactly the edge
Avg max drawdown$598the hole you sit in along the way
Avg spin of ruin#43when busts happen, this is when
Realized edge2.72%vs the wheel’s 2.70% — the punchline

Change the conditions — the price stays

VariationBust rateMedian
Standard (above)60.9%$0
Double bankroll ($1,000)41.1%$1200
Short session (50 spins)39.4%$570
Long session (200 spins)78.4%$0

First 12 spins, played by the book

#BetResultBankroll
1$250$475
2$30R$505
3$30B$475
4$40R$515
5$35B$480
6$50B$430
7$65R$495
8$55R$550
9$25B$525
10$30R$555
11$30R$585
12$15B$570

▶ Run Labouchere yourself — autopilot in the free simulator

Other systems

Flat bettingMartingaleGrand MartingaleParoli (Reverse Martingale)all 14 →

Frequently asked

Does the Labouchere system work?
Not against the edge. Over 200,000 sessions it paid the wheel 2.72% of all money wagered — the same price as betting randomly. It does concentrate losses brutally: 61% of bankrolls died within 100 spins.
What bankroll does Labouchere need?
Doubling the bankroll to $1,000 moved the bust rate from 60.9% to 41.1% in our runs — a real reduction in bust risk, purchased with more money at the same percentage price.
Is Labouchere good for short sessions?
At 50 spins the bust rate was 39.4% (vs 60.9% at 100). Shorter exposure means fewer disasters and less edge paid — which is true of every system, because time on the felt is the only variable that matters.