HomeSystems › Reverse Fibonacci

Reverse Fibonacci: advance the sequence on wins — tested to destruction

RIDES STREAKS, PAYS THE WHEEL⚙ computed
We ran 200,000 sessions of Reverse Fibonacci ($5 base on red, $500 bankroll, $500 table max, 100 spins, European wheel). Result: 0.0% of sessions busted, the median player finished at $405, and the realized house edge was 2.78% — statistically identical to the wheel’s 2.70%. A positive progression: it reshapes how you lose, never how much on average.

The distribution — what 200,000 bankrolls did

MetricValueRead it as
Bust rate0.0%sessions that hit $0 within 100 spins
Hit the table max5.0%the cap the system pretends doesn’t exist
Median finish$405the typical session — a slow bleed
10th / 90th percentile$355 / $475the bad night vs the good night
Mean finish$461the average — always below $500, by exactly the edge
Avg max drawdown$264the hole you sit in along the way
Realized edge2.78%vs the wheel’s 2.70% — the punchline

Change the conditions — the price stays

VariationBust rateMedian
Standard (above)0.0%$405
Double bankroll ($1,000)0.0%$905
Short session (50 spins)0.0%$455
Long session (200 spins)0.0%$300

First 12 spins, played by the book

#BetResultBankroll
1$50$495
2$5R$500
3$5B$495
4$5R$500
5$5B$495
6$5B$490
7$5R$495
8$5R$500
9$10B$490
10$5R$495
11$5R$500
12$10B$490

▶ Run Reverse Fibonacci yourself — autopilot in the free simulator

Other systems

Flat bettingMartingaleGrand MartingaleParoli (Reverse Martingale)all 14 →

Frequently asked

Does the Reverse Fibonacci system work?
Not against the edge. Over 200,000 sessions it paid the wheel 2.78% of all money wagered — the same price as betting randomly. It changes the shape of results — you rarely bust, you just bleed the edge in small cuts.
What bankroll does Reverse Fibonacci need?
Doubling the bankroll to $1,000 moved the bust rate from 0.0% to 0.0% in our runs — barely a dent; the exposure scales with you.
Is Reverse Fibonacci good for short sessions?
At 50 spins the bust rate was 0.0% (vs 0.0% at 100). Shorter exposure means fewer disasters and less edge paid — which is true of every system, because time on the felt is the only variable that matters.